Discontent Grows Over Deepam-2 Scheme Implementation

The dissatisfaction around the Deepam-2 scheme underscores the gap between policy intent and practical execution. While the coalition government has fulfilled its promise to provide three subsidized LPG cylinders annually, issues in implementation have caused significant discontent among beneficiaries. Beneficiaries are required to pay for the LPG cylinders upfront, with the promise of reimbursement within 2-3 days. Reports suggest delays extending to a week or more, causing financial strain and eroding trust in the scheme. Some beneficiaries, particularly in rural areas, have not received reimbursements at all, fueling doubts about the scheme's reliability. Administrative bottlenecks and insufficient coordination with banks could be contributing factors. Beneficiaries are comparing Deepam-2 to the discontinued central government LPG subsidy model, which also required upfront payment followed by delayed reimbursements. Past experiences of subsidy withdrawal by the central government have amplified skepticism about the continuity of Deepam-2.Complaints seem more pronounced among opposition party supporters, raising questions about possible political bias or mismanagement at the local level. Delays and inconsistencies damage public confidence in welfare schemes, making them less effective .Financial Strain on Beneficiaries: Upfront payments are burdensome for economically vulnerable families, especially in rural areas .Failure to address these issues promptly could impact the government's reputation, particularly as it faces existing financial constraints. The government has earned appreciation for improving infrastructure, such as roads, and for providing pensions consistently. These successes contrast with the struggles of the Deepam-2 scheme.